I'm an early stage researcher with main interests in particle physics
phenomenology and precision calculations. I'm currently located at DESY
(Hamburg).
What I'm interested in
Most scientists have a hard time explaining to a broad
audience what they are doing. Unfortunately, I'm not an exception (you've been warned!).
If you concatenate all my previous publications, a relatively clear picture
emerges.
Obviously, I'm interested in Higgs physics. The calculation
of loop corrections also seems to play a crucial role in my life.
What does this mean?
Spoiler: we don't know!
The common lore is that our understanding of the world
surrounding us can be quantified by the level of agreement between observations
(e.g. physics experiments) and predictions that are based on mathematical
models incorporating what we call laws of physics. Some laws turn out
to be more fundamental than others in the sense that they can explain
a plethora of observations in very different situations e.g. at very different energy scales.
In many cases, assuming different laws can lead to different predictions that
can be compared with experiment - allowing us to falsify our models.
Sometimes we are lucky and a more-fundamental theory predicts the existence
of effects that we haven't even thought of (i.e. suggest new experimental
setups).
One very successful model in this game is the Standard Model of Particle Physics (SM),
which predicts, among other things, a fundamental particle: the
Brout-Englert-Higgs boson (often just "the Higgs"). Luckily, a Higgs
boson has been found in 2012 at the Large Hadron Collier (LHC) - some 40 years after its prediction. However, we
don't actually know whether it's the Higgs of the SM or whether it may
be part of a more fundamental theory. People have been thinking about this
possibility for ages. Therefore, the discovery of a Higgs offers a
huge playground. On the other hand, the level of precision at which we
are comparing our model predictions to experiments is also crucial.
Every theory-number as well as every experimental result is only true within some error bars!
If those error bars are too large, clearly we can no longer distinguish
two theories that yield similar, yet different, predictions.
This is why both, theory and experiment, work very hard to provide as many
correct digits as possible in their results. Finally, I'm able to
position myself in this short story as one of the individuals that cares about
said precision predictions in theories that feature more than a Higgs
boson.
If you want to learn more about the findings of my previous journey through the particle landscape check out my
inspire profile.
Previous talks and seminars
Below is a selected list of talks I gave about my research and fields-of-interest.